<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1287 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313960</link>
    <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 bars proceedings that operate like execution, distress, or similar interference with a sick company&#039;s assets or rehabilitation scheme. An ordinary suit for recovery of money simplicitor does not, by itself, fall within that category. Where no relief is sought that would disturb assets or affect rehabilitation, the statutory bar is not attracted and prior BIFR permission is unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 06:55:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1287 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313960</link>
      <description>Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 bars proceedings that operate like execution, distress, or similar interference with a sick company&#039;s assets or rehabilitation scheme. An ordinary suit for recovery of money simplicitor does not, by itself, fall within that category. Where no relief is sought that would disturb assets or affect rehabilitation, the statutory bar is not attracted and prior BIFR permission is unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>