https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313962 The court determined it had jurisdiction and found that defendant No. 1, through defendant No. 2, booked an advertisement with the plaintiff and issued cheques for payment. Defendant No. 2 misused these cheques without authority, leading to a collusive suit. The court held defendants jointly and severally liable for the payment, ordering them to pay the plaintiff the specified sum with interest. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 May 2024 06:55:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313962 The court determined it had jurisdiction and found that defendant No. 1, through defendant No. 2, booked an advertisement with the plaintiff and issued cheques for payment. Defendant No. 2 misused these cheques without authority, leading to a collusive suit. The court held defendants jointly and severally liable for the payment, ordering them to pay the plaintiff the specified sum with interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313962