<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 447 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752394</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the impugned notices issued under sections 148A(b) and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2017-18, citing lack of jurisdiction and absence of new substantial evidence. The Court allowed the Revenue the liberty to initiate fresh reassessment proceedings if legally justified, maintaining the rights and contentions of both parties for any future actions. The writ petition was disposed of with these considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 447 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752394</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the impugned notices issued under sections 148A(b) and 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2017-18, citing lack of jurisdiction and absence of new substantial evidence. The Court allowed the Revenue the liberty to initiate fresh reassessment proceedings if legally justified, maintaining the rights and contentions of both parties for any future actions. The writ petition was disposed of with these considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>