<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 413 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the appellant failed to pay the service tax amount to the service provider within the stipulated period. Due to the appellant&#039;s absence and insufficient evidence, the Tribunal confirmed the recovery of service tax, interest, and penalties. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the original orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 07:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 413 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the appellant failed to pay the service tax amount to the service provider within the stipulated period. Due to the appellant&#039;s absence and insufficient evidence, the Tribunal confirmed the recovery of service tax, interest, and penalties. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the original orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>