https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313928 Correction of a mortgage deed by substituting different properties was not a clerical or accidental error capable of being corrected under the court's powers under Sections 152 or 151 CPC. The mistake lay in the mortgage deed itself, and if it arose from mutual mistake, the proper remedy was a suit for rectification under the Specific Relief Act. Inherent powers could not be used to alter the substantive terms of the mortgage deed or the foundation of the suit where a specific statutory remedy was available. The application was therefore outside the scope of Sections 152 and 151 CPC and should be dismissed. en-us Wed, 12 Mar 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 May 2024 14:17:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313928 Correction of a mortgage deed by substituting different properties was not a clerical or accidental error capable of being corrected under the court's powers under Sections 152 or 151 CPC. The mistake lay in the mortgage deed itself, and if it arose from mutual mistake, the proper remedy was a suit for rectification under the Specific Relief Act. Inherent powers could not be used to alter the substantive terms of the mortgage deed or the foundation of the suit where a specific statutory remedy was available. The application was therefore outside the scope of Sections 152 and 151 CPC and should be dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Mar 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313928