<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (5) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313923</link>
    <description>Section 152 CPC is confined to correcting clerical errors, arithmetical mistakes, and accidental slips in a court&#039;s own judgment, decree, or order, where the intended description is clear. It cannot be used to resolve disputed questions of intention or to rewrite antecedent transaction documents such as an agreement for sale. Where the alleged mistake is fundamental and would require evidence on what property the parties meant to deal with, rectification lies in a suit under the Specific Relief Act, not by summary correction. Relief may also be refused where inordinate unexplained delay has caused prejudice or third-party rights have intervened.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 14:10:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (5) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313923</link>
      <description>Section 152 CPC is confined to correcting clerical errors, arithmetical mistakes, and accidental slips in a court&#039;s own judgment, decree, or order, where the intended description is clear. It cannot be used to resolve disputed questions of intention or to rewrite antecedent transaction documents such as an agreement for sale. Where the alleged mistake is fundamental and would require evidence on what property the parties meant to deal with, rectification lies in a suit under the Specific Relief Act, not by summary correction. Relief may also be refused where inordinate unexplained delay has caused prejudice or third-party rights have intervened.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>