<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 831 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313921</link>
    <description>Section 22 of SICA bars recovery proceedings only where the liability sought to be enforced is shown to be covered by the rehabilitation scheme or otherwise falls within the statutory embargo. Mere pendency of SICA proceedings or an appeal is not enough; the party invoking the bar must produce material showing that the respondent&#039;s claim was included in the scheme before the BIFR. As no such material was produced, the statutory protection did not apply, the recovery suit was maintainable, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 831 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313921</link>
      <description>Section 22 of SICA bars recovery proceedings only where the liability sought to be enforced is shown to be covered by the rehabilitation scheme or otherwise falls within the statutory embargo. Mere pendency of SICA proceedings or an appeal is not enough; the party invoking the bar must produce material showing that the respondent&#039;s claim was included in the scheme before the BIFR. As no such material was produced, the statutory protection did not apply, the recovery suit was maintainable, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>