<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 406 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752353</link>
    <description>HC addressed a case involving provisional attachment of a bank account under CGST Act, Section 83(2). Revenue authorities had improperly continued the attachment beyond statutory limits. After court intervention, the attachment was lifted. The HC emphasized the need for administrative authorities to rectify errors independently and avoid unnecessary litigation, directing communication to tax authorities for remedial measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 406 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752353</link>
      <description>HC addressed a case involving provisional attachment of a bank account under CGST Act, Section 83(2). Revenue authorities had improperly continued the attachment beyond statutory limits. After court intervention, the attachment was lifted. The HC emphasized the need for administrative authorities to rectify errors independently and avoid unnecessary litigation, directing communication to tax authorities for remedial measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>