<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752339</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition u/s 68 regarding unexplained gifts totaling Rs. 1,00,35,000 received from family members. The tribunal found that gifts from assessee&#039;s brother (Rs. 97,35,000), mother (Rs. 1,50,000), sister (Rs. 1,50,000), and father&#039;s HUF were genuine based on established identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. Brother&#039;s income of Rs. 37,48,84,100 supported his creditworthiness for the substantial gift. Mother&#039;s and sister&#039;s incomes justified their respective gifts. Father&#039;s HUF showed adequate cash and income. AO failed to provide contrary evidence or proper reasoning for additions. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 392 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752339</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of addition u/s 68 regarding unexplained gifts totaling Rs. 1,00,35,000 received from family members. The tribunal found that gifts from assessee&#039;s brother (Rs. 97,35,000), mother (Rs. 1,50,000), sister (Rs. 1,50,000), and father&#039;s HUF were genuine based on established identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness. Brother&#039;s income of Rs. 37,48,84,100 supported his creditworthiness for the substantial gift. Mother&#039;s and sister&#039;s incomes justified their respective gifts. Father&#039;s HUF showed adequate cash and income. AO failed to provide contrary evidence or proper reasoning for additions. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>