<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 390 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752337</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed an assessee&#039;s rectification application under section 154, finding multiple errors in depreciation calculations. The tribunal identified a mismatch between depreciation amounts shown in books (Rs. 6,23,97,846) versus ITR-6 filing (Rs. 6,65,43,786) that required verification. Regarding additional depreciation, the assessee claimed remaining 50% for plant machinery after claiming initial 50% in previous year due to less than 180 days usage. The tribunal also directed examination of fresh gratuity claims under section 154, citing Promod R Aggarwal precedent. All grounds were allowed for statistical purposes, requiring proper verification by assessing officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 08:39:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 390 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752337</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed an assessee&#039;s rectification application under section 154, finding multiple errors in depreciation calculations. The tribunal identified a mismatch between depreciation amounts shown in books (Rs. 6,23,97,846) versus ITR-6 filing (Rs. 6,65,43,786) that required verification. Regarding additional depreciation, the assessee claimed remaining 50% for plant machinery after claiming initial 50% in previous year due to less than 180 days usage. The tribunal also directed examination of fresh gratuity claims under section 154, citing Promod R Aggarwal precedent. All grounds were allowed for statistical purposes, requiring proper verification by assessing officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>