<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36693</link>
    <description>Buildings and land used for public worship or public charity may qualify for exemption under section 6(f) where the rent derived from them is applied to religious or charitable objects. The expression &quot;rent derived&quot; was read as net rent after legitimate incidental outgoings directly connected with the trust&#039;s objects and the maintenance of its properties, including repairs, salaries, taxes, insurance, litigation, and rent collection expenses. Those expenditures were treated as part of the trust&#039;s religious and charitable administration, and the remaining income applied to such objects satisfied the proviso. The trust&#039;s properties were therefore entitled to exemption, and the tax assessments could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:38:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36693</link>
      <description>Buildings and land used for public worship or public charity may qualify for exemption under section 6(f) where the rent derived from them is applied to religious or charitable objects. The expression &quot;rent derived&quot; was read as net rent after legitimate incidental outgoings directly connected with the trust&#039;s objects and the maintenance of its properties, including repairs, salaries, taxes, insurance, litigation, and rent collection expenses. Those expenditures were treated as part of the trust&#039;s religious and charitable administration, and the remaining income applied to such objects satisfied the proviso. The trust&#039;s properties were therefore entitled to exemption, and the tax assessments could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>