<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 377 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that since the Cheque for service charges was not encashed, no consideration was received, rendering the Service Tax demand invalid. Consequently, the impugned Order-in-Appeal was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 377 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that since the Cheque for service charges was not encashed, no consideration was received, rendering the Service Tax demand invalid. Consequently, the impugned Order-in-Appeal was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>