<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (7) TMI 28 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36690</link>
    <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the IAC, Range XXII, to proceed with penalty proceedings and the validity of the transfer of cases under Section 123 of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that the IAC had the authority to issue penalty notices and that procedural fairness was maintained. The appeal was allowed, the previous judgment and order were set aside, and the application under Article 226 was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:33:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (7) TMI 28 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36690</link>
      <description>The court upheld the jurisdiction of the IAC, Range XXII, to proceed with penalty proceedings and the validity of the transfer of cases under Section 123 of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that the IAC had the authority to issue penalty notices and that procedural fairness was maintained. The appeal was allowed, the previous judgment and order were set aside, and the application under Article 226 was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>