<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1753 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313906</link>
    <description>A transaction that assigns only the right to pursue enhanced compensation after land acquisition is a mere right to sue and is not transferable under Section 6(e) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Where the acquired land had already vested in the State and the vendors had received the estimated compensation, a deed purporting to transfer only objections, references, appeals and claims for higher compensation could not convey any interest in the land. The text also notes that if execution of such a deed is not satisfactorily proved, and the beneficiary fails to discharge the shifted burden on genuineness, the deed cannot support a compensation claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 23:06:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1753 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313906</link>
      <description>A transaction that assigns only the right to pursue enhanced compensation after land acquisition is a mere right to sue and is not transferable under Section 6(e) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Where the acquired land had already vested in the State and the vendors had received the estimated compensation, a deed purporting to transfer only objections, references, appeals and claims for higher compensation could not convey any interest in the land. The text also notes that if execution of such a deed is not satisfactorily proved, and the beneficiary fails to discharge the shifted burden on genuineness, the deed cannot support a compensation claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>