https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313893 A State boundary dispute arising out of, or connected with, pre-Constitution notifications and agreements falls within the exclusion in the proviso to Article 131 and is outside the Supreme Court's original original jurisdiction. The Court read the expressions in the proviso broadly and treated the 1920, 1923 and 1927 notifications, as well as the 1943 agreement, as instruments covered by it. A challenge that the 1927 notification was void did not alter the position because the claims and defences remained tied to those instruments. The suit was therefore not maintainable in the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction. en-us Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 May 2024 12:08:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313893 A State boundary dispute arising out of, or connected with, pre-Constitution notifications and agreements falls within the exclusion in the proviso to Article 131 and is outside the Supreme Court's original original jurisdiction. The Court read the expressions in the proviso broadly and treated the 1920, 1923 and 1927 notifications, as well as the 1943 agreement, as instruments covered by it. A challenge that the 1927 notification was void did not alter the position because the claims and defences remained tied to those instruments. The suit was therefore not maintainable in the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313893