<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 812 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313893</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the boundary dispute suit between the States of Orissa and Andhra Pradesh, ruling it outside its original jurisdiction under Article 131 of the Indian Constitution. The Court determined the disputes arose from historical agreements predating the Constitution, thus falling within the exclusionary clause. The dismissal did not address the merits, and the parties agreed to maintain the status quo until an appropriate authority intervenes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 12:08:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 812 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313893</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the boundary dispute suit between the States of Orissa and Andhra Pradesh, ruling it outside its original jurisdiction under Article 131 of the Indian Constitution. The Court determined the disputes arose from historical agreements predating the Constitution, thus falling within the exclusionary clause. The dismissal did not address the merits, and the parties agreed to maintain the status quo until an appropriate authority intervenes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>