<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 54 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36686</link>
    <description>House rent allowance was considered under section 10(13A) read with rule 2A where a judge occupied his own house and paid tax on its annual letting value. The Court treated the issue as covered by its earlier decision and held that this circumstance did not prevent the allowance from qualifying for exemption. On those facts, the house rent allowance was not includible in taxable income and was exempt under the governing provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:24:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 54 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36686</link>
      <description>House rent allowance was considered under section 10(13A) read with rule 2A where a judge occupied his own house and paid tax on its annual letting value. The Court treated the issue as covered by its earlier decision and held that this circumstance did not prevent the allowance from qualifying for exemption. On those facts, the house rent allowance was not includible in taxable income and was exempt under the governing provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>