<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>IGST Rate for Branded Nutrition Supplements Set at 18%, Not 28%, According to Tribunal&#039;s Classification Ruling.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77202</link>
    <description>Classification of imported goods - Applicable rate of IGST - 28% or 18% - Scope of the term &quot;i.e.&quot;- Interpretation of the Notification No.1/2017-IGST-Rate - Import of branded nutrition/ dietary supplements - Regarding the classification of goods, it determined that the appellant&#039;s goods did not fall under the specific items listed under Entry No. 9 of Schedule IV. Instead, they were found to be covered under Entry No. 453 of Schedule III, as they were not specified in any other schedule. - In relation to the interpretation of the Schedule IV entry, the Tribunal reiterated that the use of &quot;i.e.&quot; in the entry limited its scope to the items listed thereafter, excluding any other products not explicitly mentioned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 08:18:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 08:18:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>IGST Rate for Branded Nutrition Supplements Set at 18%, Not 28%, According to Tribunal&#039;s Classification Ruling.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77202</link>
      <description>Classification of imported goods - Applicable rate of IGST - 28% or 18% - Scope of the term &quot;i.e.&quot;- Interpretation of the Notification No.1/2017-IGST-Rate - Import of branded nutrition/ dietary supplements - Regarding the classification of goods, it determined that the appellant&#039;s goods did not fall under the specific items listed under Entry No. 9 of Schedule IV. Instead, they were found to be covered under Entry No. 453 of Schedule III, as they were not specified in any other schedule. - In relation to the interpretation of the Schedule IV entry, the Tribunal reiterated that the use of &quot;i.e.&quot; in the entry limited its scope to the items listed thereafter, excluding any other products not explicitly mentioned.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 08:18:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>