<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 362 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752309</link>
    <description>The Calcutta HC set aside an order directing the appellant to reverse input tax credit (ITC) without proper verification from the supplier. The court held that the tax authority acted arbitrarily by ignoring tax invoices and bank statements proving payment for goods/services and applicable taxes. Citing Bharti Airtel Ltd, the court emphasized that Form GSTR-2A is merely a facilitator for self-assessment decisions. The authority should have first taken action against the selling dealer unless exceptional circumstances like collusion, missing dealer, or business closure existed. The denial of credit without following due process violated natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 362 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752309</link>
      <description>The Calcutta HC set aside an order directing the appellant to reverse input tax credit (ITC) without proper verification from the supplier. The court held that the tax authority acted arbitrarily by ignoring tax invoices and bank statements proving payment for goods/services and applicable taxes. Citing Bharti Airtel Ltd, the court emphasized that Form GSTR-2A is merely a facilitator for self-assessment decisions. The authority should have first taken action against the selling dealer unless exceptional circumstances like collusion, missing dealer, or business closure existed. The denial of credit without following due process violated natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>