https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752304 GST intimation relating to mining lease payments under the reverse charge mechanism was treated as covered by the same interim arrangement as the connected batch. The petitioner was allowed to file a reply to the intimation within four weeks, and the matter was kept aligned with the pending Supreme Court consideration on the nature of royalty. The document records that earlier directions had permitted adjudication to proceed while keeping the resulting orders in abeyance until the Nine Judge Constitution Bench decides the royalty issue, and the present petition was disposed of on identical terms with consequential proceedings closed. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 May 2024 10:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752304 GST intimation relating to mining lease payments under the reverse charge mechanism was treated as covered by the same interim arrangement as the connected batch. The petitioner was allowed to file a reply to the intimation within four weeks, and the matter was kept aligned with the pending Supreme Court consideration on the nature of royalty. The document records that earlier directions had permitted adjudication to proceed while keeping the resulting orders in abeyance until the Nine Judge Constitution Bench decides the royalty issue, and the present petition was disposed of on identical terms with consequential proceedings closed. Case-Laws GST Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752304