<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1377 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313885</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order dated 8th March 2023, passed under Section 129(3) of the WBGST Act, 2017, which imposed a penalty for the expiry of an e-way bill. The Court determined that the delay was neither willful nor deliberate, attributing it to circumstances beyond the petitioner&#039;s control. Consequently, all legal consequences related to the penalty were nullified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 20:05:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1377 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313885</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order dated 8th March 2023, passed under Section 129(3) of the WBGST Act, 2017, which imposed a penalty for the expiry of an e-way bill. The Court determined that the delay was neither willful nor deliberate, attributing it to circumstances beyond the petitioner&#039;s control. Consequently, all legal consequences related to the penalty were nullified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>