<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2059 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313880</link>
    <description>The Madras HC allowed the writ petition challenging violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner had submitted a detailed reply dated 03.01.2019 to a show cause notice, which respondents 1 and 2 failed to consider on merits. The court directed respondents to examine the petitioner&#039;s reply and pass a reasoned order within four weeks of receiving the court&#039;s order, emphasizing the requirement for proper consideration of submissions before making decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 20:05:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2059 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313880</link>
      <description>The Madras HC allowed the writ petition challenging violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner had submitted a detailed reply dated 03.01.2019 to a show cause notice, which respondents 1 and 2 failed to consider on merits. The court directed respondents to examine the petitioner&#039;s reply and pass a reasoned order within four weeks of receiving the court&#039;s order, emphasizing the requirement for proper consideration of submissions before making decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>