<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (9) TMI 14 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313870</link>
    <description>Probate under the Indian Succession Act is a judgment in rem and remains conclusive until revoked for just cause. The High Court&#039;s ordinary original civil jurisdiction is distinct from its testamentary and intestate jurisdiction, even when exercised by the same Court. A civil suit on the original side cannot determine the validity of a will or revoke an existing probate grant; revocation must be sought by a petition before the probate jurisdiction that granted it. The requested revocation relief was therefore not maintainable in the ordinary original civil suit, and the plaintiffs were required to proceed by separate testamentary petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 15:03:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (9) TMI 14 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313870</link>
      <description>Probate under the Indian Succession Act is a judgment in rem and remains conclusive until revoked for just cause. The High Court&#039;s ordinary original civil jurisdiction is distinct from its testamentary and intestate jurisdiction, even when exercised by the same Court. A civil suit on the original side cannot determine the validity of a will or revoke an existing probate grant; revocation must be sought by a petition before the probate jurisdiction that granted it. The requested revocation relief was therefore not maintainable in the ordinary original civil suit, and the plaintiffs were required to proceed by separate testamentary petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>