<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 301 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752248</link>
    <description>Rule 68B of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act limits the sale of immovable property attached for tax recovery to the prescribed period counted from the end of the financial year in which the demand-giving order becomes conclusive or final. Where the sale is not made within that time, the attachment is deemed to have been vacated unless a statutory exception applies. On the admitted facts, the demand had attained finality earlier, but the sale notice and attachment were issued after the limitation period, and no extension or exclusion of time was shown. The impugned sale notice and attachment were therefore time-barred and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 301 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752248</link>
      <description>Rule 68B of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act limits the sale of immovable property attached for tax recovery to the prescribed period counted from the end of the financial year in which the demand-giving order becomes conclusive or final. Where the sale is not made within that time, the attachment is deemed to have been vacated unless a statutory exception applies. On the admitted facts, the demand had attained finality earlier, but the sale notice and attachment were issued after the limitation period, and no extension or exclusion of time was shown. The impugned sale notice and attachment were therefore time-barred and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>