https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752224 Non-supply of each side's replies, written submissions and supporting documents in a remanded adjudication violated natural justice, because every participating party was entitled to know and meet the other side's material before a binding decision was made. The High Court held that this procedural defect vitiated the adjudication and could not be sustained. As the dispute depended on appreciation of rival factual materials, it was not fit for final resolution on affidavits in writ jurisdiction. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remanded for de novo consideration with full disclosure of materials, opportunity to reply and personal hearing to all concerned parties. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 May 2024 09:19:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752224 Non-supply of each side's replies, written submissions and supporting documents in a remanded adjudication violated natural justice, because every participating party was entitled to know and meet the other side's material before a binding decision was made. The High Court held that this procedural defect vitiated the adjudication and could not be sustained. As the dispute depended on appreciation of rival factual materials, it was not fit for final resolution on affidavits in writ jurisdiction. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remanded for de novo consideration with full disclosure of materials, opportunity to reply and personal hearing to all concerned parties. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752224