https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313864 Delhi HC set aside trial court's order allowing defendant's recall application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. Despite defendant's claim of lack of communication with counsel while in judicial custody, evidence showed defendant applied for certified copies, appeared before SC through counsel, and filed reopening application via pairokar during the same period. Court found defendant's failure to appear was due to his own default, not circumstances beyond control. HC exercised supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution to reverse trial court's decision in suit for recovery of goods' price. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 05 May 2024 10:40:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313864 Delhi HC set aside trial court's order allowing defendant's recall application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. Despite defendant's claim of lack of communication with counsel while in judicial custody, evidence showed defendant applied for certified copies, appeared before SC through counsel, and filed reopening application via pairokar during the same period. Court found defendant's failure to appear was due to his own default, not circumstances beyond control. HC exercised supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution to reverse trial court's decision in suit for recovery of goods' price. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313864