<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 89 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36662</link>
    <description>For section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a taxable benefit arises only on an actual remission or cessation of liability. A unilateral reversal of an accounting entry, including transfer of an amount earlier allowed as a deduction, does not by itself extinguish the liability or constitute cessation. On that basis, the amount reversed in the profit and loss account could not be taxed as a benefit under section 41(1), and the view favourable to the assessee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:22:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 89 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36662</link>
      <description>For section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a taxable benefit arises only on an actual remission or cessation of liability. A unilateral reversal of an accounting entry, including transfer of an amount earlier allowed as a deduction, does not by itself extinguish the liability or constitute cessation. On that basis, the amount reversed in the profit and loss account could not be taxed as a benefit under section 41(1), and the view favourable to the assessee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>