https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313855 An appeal under Section 9-C of the Customs Tariff Act was held maintainable after the anti-dumping determination had culminated in a notification issued under Rule 18 of the Anti-Dumping Rules. The prior view that only a recommendatory order of the designated authority existed was displaced because the determination had been completed when the notification was issued. The appeal also challenged the customs notification imposing anti-dumping duty, so the statutory appellate remedy extended to the determination and the notification-based action rather than stopping at a merely recommendatory stage. en-us Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 May 2024 11:37:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313855 An appeal under Section 9-C of the Customs Tariff Act was held maintainable after the anti-dumping determination had culminated in a notification issued under Rule 18 of the Anti-Dumping Rules. The prior view that only a recommendatory order of the designated authority existed was displaced because the determination had been completed when the notification was issued. The appeal also challenged the customs notification imposing anti-dumping duty, so the statutory appellate remedy extended to the determination and the notification-based action rather than stopping at a merely recommendatory stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313855