https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752215 HC set aside a GST demand order u/s 73 due to improper consideration of petitioner's detailed replies. The court found the Proper Officer failed to adequately review submitted documents and did not seek clarifications. Order was remitted for re-adjudication, with petitioner granted 30 days to file a further reply and the Proper Officer directed to pass a fresh speaking order within prescribed period. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 May 2025 16:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752215 HC set aside a GST demand order u/s 73 due to improper consideration of petitioner's detailed replies. The court found the Proper Officer failed to adequately review submitted documents and did not seek clarifications. Order was remitted for re-adjudication, with petitioner granted 30 days to file a further reply and the Proper Officer directed to pass a fresh speaking order within prescribed period. Case-Laws GST Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752215