<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 256 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752203</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned assessment order imposing GST on vouchers due to insufficient reasoning. The petitioner, managing reward programs, argued that as an intermediary, it was not a supplier of goods underlying the vouchers. The court remanded the issue for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a fresh speaking order within two months, addressing the petitioner&#039;s contentions. The petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2024 21:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 256 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752203</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned assessment order imposing GST on vouchers due to insufficient reasoning. The petitioner, managing reward programs, argued that as an intermediary, it was not a supplier of goods underlying the vouchers. The court remanded the issue for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a fresh speaking order within two months, addressing the petitioner&#039;s contentions. The petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>