<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 247 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752194</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging registration cancellation. Petitioner failed to file timely appeal, utilize Amnesty Scheme, and demonstrate returns filing within statutory period. Court emphasized alternate remedies and importance of complying with statutory requirements, rejecting extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 247 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752194</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging registration cancellation. Petitioner failed to file timely appeal, utilize Amnesty Scheme, and demonstrate returns filing within statutory period. Court emphasized alternate remedies and importance of complying with statutory requirements, rejecting extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>