<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 245 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752192</link>
    <description>Cancellation of regular bail requires cogent and overwhelming reasons, not a merely different view on the original bail order. In the absence of any supervening circumstance affecting trial fairness or any breach of bail conditions, interference is unwarranted. The unchallenged grant of bail to a co-accused also weighed against cancellation. On these facts, the request to cancel bail was rejected and the existing bail order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2024 00:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 245 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752192</link>
      <description>Cancellation of regular bail requires cogent and overwhelming reasons, not a merely different view on the original bail order. In the absence of any supervening circumstance affecting trial fairness or any breach of bail conditions, interference is unwarranted. The unchallenged grant of bail to a co-accused also weighed against cancellation. On these facts, the request to cancel bail was rejected and the existing bail order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>