<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 240 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752187</link>
    <description>GST demand on royalty paid to the Mining Department toward a mining lease was challenged through a writ petition against the show cause notice and assessment orders. The petitioner accepted that the issue had already been decided in earlier connected writ proceedings, where the Court had held that the respondents&#039; action in imposing GST on royalty was not liable to be interfered with. The writ petition was dismissed in terms of those earlier orders, and the challenge to the GST demand on royalty did not succeed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 240 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752187</link>
      <description>GST demand on royalty paid to the Mining Department toward a mining lease was challenged through a writ petition against the show cause notice and assessment orders. The petitioner accepted that the issue had already been decided in earlier connected writ proceedings, where the Court had held that the respondents&#039; action in imposing GST on royalty was not liable to be interfered with. The writ petition was dismissed in terms of those earlier orders, and the challenge to the GST demand on royalty did not succeed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>