https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752158 Section 143AA of the Customs Act, 1962 enables trade-facilitation measures, while Rule 11(2) of the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transshipment Regulations, 2018 addresses suspension of an authorised carrier for specified regulatory defaults. In a dispute over release of the original bill of lading, delivery order, and detention charges between an importer and a carrier, the customs authority was held not to be required to intervene because the statutory conditions for regulatory action were not met. The petition was therefore dismissed, with the dispute treated as a private matter outside the scope of the customs authority's intervention powers. en-us Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 May 2024 14:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752158 Section 143AA of the Customs Act, 1962 enables trade-facilitation measures, while Rule 11(2) of the Sea Cargo Manifest and Transshipment Regulations, 2018 addresses suspension of an authorised carrier for specified regulatory defaults. In a dispute over release of the original bill of lading, delivery order, and detention charges between an importer and a carrier, the customs authority was held not to be required to intervene because the statutory conditions for regulatory action were not met. The petition was therefore dismissed, with the dispute treated as a private matter outside the scope of the customs authority's intervention powers. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752158