<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 208 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to provide evidence of contemporaneous imports, which was essential for justifying the rejection and revision of the declared import value. The Revenue&#039;s inability to produce necessary documents, such as bill of entries, led to the conclusion that the original assessment was unsustainable, granting the appellants consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2024 08:00:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 208 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to provide evidence of contemporaneous imports, which was essential for justifying the rejection and revision of the declared import value. The Revenue&#039;s inability to produce necessary documents, such as bill of entries, led to the conclusion that the original assessment was unsustainable, granting the appellants consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>