<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 206 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752153</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad ruled on territorial jurisdiction for duty refund claims. The appellant company&#039;s factory was located in Ghaziabad, making the Assistant Commissioner, Ghaziabad the jurisdictional authority for refund matters, not Noida authorities. The court held that territorial jurisdiction for refund is determined by factory location where duty was originally paid. The Assistant Commissioner, Ghaziabad correctly sanctioned the cash refund of excess duty. Previous litigation had attained finality with no further appeals by Revenue. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed, confirming Ghaziabad&#039;s jurisdiction over the refund matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2024 14:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 206 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752153</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad ruled on territorial jurisdiction for duty refund claims. The appellant company&#039;s factory was located in Ghaziabad, making the Assistant Commissioner, Ghaziabad the jurisdictional authority for refund matters, not Noida authorities. The court held that territorial jurisdiction for refund is determined by factory location where duty was originally paid. The Assistant Commissioner, Ghaziabad correctly sanctioned the cash refund of excess duty. Previous litigation had attained finality with no further appeals by Revenue. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed, confirming Ghaziabad&#039;s jurisdiction over the refund matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>