<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 2031 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313846</link>
    <description>The Tribunal referred the matter to a Larger Bench to resolve whether an assessee, who did not opt for provisional assessment, can claim a refund of excess duty paid under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The referral was necessitated by conflicting interpretations between the Tribunal and the High Court. The Tribunal directed the Registrar to present the case to the Honorable President for constituting the Larger Bench, highlighting the need for a definitive resolution on this pivotal legal question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 20:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 2031 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313846</link>
      <description>The Tribunal referred the matter to a Larger Bench to resolve whether an assessee, who did not opt for provisional assessment, can claim a refund of excess duty paid under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The referral was necessitated by conflicting interpretations between the Tribunal and the High Court. The Tribunal directed the Registrar to present the case to the Honorable President for constituting the Larger Bench, highlighting the need for a definitive resolution on this pivotal legal question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>