<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1235 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313849</link>
    <description>Land in a cantonment held on old grant terms is governed by the Government Grants Act, 1895, so the grant operates according to its own tenor and the Union may resume the land where the grant reserves that right. The respondents could not rely on ordinary landlord-tenant or ownership concepts to resist resumption, because the grant documents and admission certificate showed that only limited rights in the superstructure were accepted and the land remained subject to the Government&#039;s resumption power. Ordinary property law could not override the special regime governing Government grants; the Union&#039;s resumption claim therefore prevailed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 20:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1235 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313849</link>
      <description>Land in a cantonment held on old grant terms is governed by the Government Grants Act, 1895, so the grant operates according to its own tenor and the Union may resume the land where the grant reserves that right. The respondents could not rely on ordinary landlord-tenant or ownership concepts to resist resumption, because the grant documents and admission certificate showed that only limited rights in the superstructure were accepted and the land remained subject to the Government&#039;s resumption power. Ordinary property law could not override the special regime governing Government grants; the Union&#039;s resumption claim therefore prevailed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>