https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313847 An appellate tribunal will generally not interfere with a discretionary order rejecting an interlocutory application unless a clear basis for intervention is shown. Here, the tribunal upheld the rejection of I.A.-1408 of 2022, noting that the matters sought to be introduced had already been raised during the proceedings and that the application risked delay. It also clarified that any observations made by the adjudicating authority while rejecting the application would not affect the merits, and that all contentions of the parties remain open for decision in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 May 2024 20:09:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313847 An appellate tribunal will generally not interfere with a discretionary order rejecting an interlocutory application unless a clear basis for intervention is shown. Here, the tribunal upheld the rejection of I.A.-1408 of 2022, noting that the matters sought to be introduced had already been raised during the proceedings and that the application risked delay. It also clarified that any observations made by the adjudicating authority while rejecting the application would not affect the merits, and that all contentions of the parties remain open for decision in accordance with law. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313847