<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36649</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that bonus shares issued to a minor daughter could not be considered assets transferred by the assessee under the Wealth Tax Act. The shares were allotted by the company based on the original shareholding and were not directly or indirectly transferred by the assessee. Therefore, the bonus shares gifted to the minor daughter were excluded in computing the net wealth of the assessee, aligning with the interpretation of section 4(1)(a)(ii) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:20:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 35 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36649</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that bonus shares issued to a minor daughter could not be considered assets transferred by the assessee under the Wealth Tax Act. The shares were allotted by the company based on the original shareholding and were not directly or indirectly transferred by the assessee. Therefore, the bonus shares gifted to the minor daughter were excluded in computing the net wealth of the assessee, aligning with the interpretation of section 4(1)(a)(ii) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>