https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313829 Admitted signatures on the cheque and pronotes attracted statutory presumptions in favour of the complainant, and the accused failed to rebut them with a probable, credible defence. The plea of misuse of blank signed instruments was unsupported, the accused did not enter the witness box, and the defence evidence was found unreliable. Interference with the acquittal was justified because the trial court's view was based on a misappreciation of evidence and an erroneous approach to the record. The acquittal was therefore set aside and the conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was restored in substance. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 May 2024 19:06:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313829 Admitted signatures on the cheque and pronotes attracted statutory presumptions in favour of the complainant, and the accused failed to rebut them with a probable, credible defence. The plea of misuse of blank signed instruments was unsupported, the accused did not enter the witness box, and the defence evidence was found unreliable. Interference with the acquittal was justified because the trial court's view was based on a misappreciation of evidence and an erroneous approach to the record. The acquittal was therefore set aside and the conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was restored in substance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313829