<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1401 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313826</link>
    <description>ITAT DELHI dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding bogus share capital under Section 68. The assessee firm introduced capital through a partner whose identity was established. The tribunal held that if the AO doubted the genuineness of funds, the addition should be made in the partner&#039;s individual assessment rather than the firm&#039;s hands. The decision was supported by precedent from MP HC in Metachem Industries case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 19:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1401 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313826</link>
      <description>ITAT DELHI dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding bogus share capital under Section 68. The assessee firm introduced capital through a partner whose identity was established. The tribunal held that if the AO doubted the genuineness of funds, the addition should be made in the partner&#039;s individual assessment rather than the firm&#039;s hands. The decision was supported by precedent from MP HC in Metachem Industries case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>