https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313837 Where an efficacious statutory remedy exists under the Waqf Act, 1995, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be exercised, particularly when the dispute involves contested questions of fact and no recognised exception is shown. Section 83 provides a remedy before the Waqf Tribunal for a person aggrieved by an order under the Act, and the presence of that alternate forum weighed against admission of the writ petition. As no basis was shown to bypass the statutory route, the High Court declined to entertain the petition and left the petitioner to pursue the Tribunal remedy. en-us Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 May 2024 19:06:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313837 Where an efficacious statutory remedy exists under the Waqf Act, 1995, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be exercised, particularly when the dispute involves contested questions of fact and no recognised exception is shown. Section 83 provides a remedy before the Waqf Tribunal for a person aggrieved by an order under the Act, and the presence of that alternate forum weighed against admission of the writ petition. As no basis was shown to bypass the statutory route, the High Court declined to entertain the petition and left the petitioner to pursue the Tribunal remedy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313837