https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313815 Cancellation of bail under the anti-terror law was found unsustainable because the statutory bar required the court to hear the prosecution and be satisfied that the accusation was prima facie true. In assessing alleged conduct under the relevant provisions, the inquiry centred on whether the acts were done with the intention of furthering a terrorist organisation. The materials relied on by the prosecution did not make the trial court's distinction between voluntary funding and payment under threat unreasonable, and the finding that the accused were not shown to be voluntary contributors or sympathisers, while cooperating with investigation, was not demonstrated to be perverse or impossible. Interference with the grant of bail was therefore unwarranted. en-us Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 May 2024 15:07:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313815 Cancellation of bail under the anti-terror law was found unsustainable because the statutory bar required the court to hear the prosecution and be satisfied that the accusation was prima facie true. In assessing alleged conduct under the relevant provisions, the inquiry centred on whether the acts were done with the intention of furthering a terrorist organisation. The materials relied on by the prosecution did not make the trial court's distinction between voluntary funding and payment under threat unreasonable, and the finding that the accused were not shown to be voluntary contributors or sympathisers, while cooperating with investigation, was not demonstrated to be perverse or impossible. Interference with the grant of bail was therefore unwarranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313815