<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Affirms NCLT Jurisdiction on Insolvency Application; Single Judicial Member&#039;s Authority Validated.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77077</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction of NCLT - Constitution of its Benches - Competency of Member of the Tribunal to function as a Bench - The Court interprets Section 419(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, and concludes that the proviso allows a single Judicial Member to exercise the powers of the Tribunal if authorized by the President. In this case, the President did authorize a Special Bench comprising of a single Member (Judicial) for specific dates, including the date of the judgment. - The Supreme Court finds that the NCLT did have jurisdiction to admit the application under Section 9 IBC 2016. - Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the CIRP proceedings were directed to continue as per the Code.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 07:56:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 07:56:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Affirms NCLT Jurisdiction on Insolvency Application; Single Judicial Member&#039;s Authority Validated.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77077</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction of NCLT - Constitution of its Benches - Competency of Member of the Tribunal to function as a Bench - The Court interprets Section 419(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, and concludes that the proviso allows a single Judicial Member to exercise the powers of the Tribunal if authorized by the President. In this case, the President did authorize a Special Bench comprising of a single Member (Judicial) for specific dates, including the date of the judgment. - The Supreme Court finds that the NCLT did have jurisdiction to admit the application under Section 9 IBC 2016. - Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the CIRP proceedings were directed to continue as per the Code.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 07:56:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>