<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 182 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752129</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a tax dispute involving alleged non-reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court found the original order dated 20.11.2023 unsustainable as the petitioner&#039;s reply was not considered. HC set aside the order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed respondent to provide personal hearing within three months. Petitioner granted 15 days to submit reply. Writ petition disposed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 182 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752129</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a tax dispute involving alleged non-reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The court found the original order dated 20.11.2023 unsustainable as the petitioner&#039;s reply was not considered. HC set aside the order, remanded the matter for reconsideration, and directed respondent to provide personal hearing within three months. Petitioner granted 15 days to submit reply. Writ petition disposed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>