<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 163 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752110</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC ruled that TDS under section 194I is not applicable on transit rent paid by developers to tenants. The court held that transit rent, commonly known as hardship/rehabilitation/displacement allowance, is compensation paid by developers to tenants for dispossession hardship, not traditional rent paid by tenant to landlord. Since transit rent is not a revenue receipt and not taxable, no TDS deduction is required. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 163 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752110</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC ruled that TDS under section 194I is not applicable on transit rent paid by developers to tenants. The court held that transit rent, commonly known as hardship/rehabilitation/displacement allowance, is compensation paid by developers to tenants for dispossession hardship, not traditional rent paid by tenant to landlord. Since transit rent is not a revenue receipt and not taxable, no TDS deduction is required. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>