<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752094</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that where assessee maintained books of account, purchase/sale bills, banking transactions, and declared sales in MVAT returns, addition for bogus purchases should be restricted to differential gross profit rate. Since genuine purchases yielded 5.66% GP while bogus purchases showed 3.10% GP, only the difference of 2.56% on bogus purchases was added to income rather than treating entire bogus purchase amount as undisclosed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 07:11:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 147 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752094</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that where assessee maintained books of account, purchase/sale bills, banking transactions, and declared sales in MVAT returns, addition for bogus purchases should be restricted to differential gross profit rate. Since genuine purchases yielded 5.66% GP while bogus purchases showed 3.10% GP, only the difference of 2.56% on bogus purchases was added to income rather than treating entire bogus purchase amount as undisclosed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>