<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 138 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752085</link>
    <description>A registered assignment deed and Section 5 of SARFAESI enable an assignee asset reconstruction company to step into the lender&#039;s shoes and maintain a Section 7 application as a financial creditor. The challenge that the assignment deed was insufficiently stamped did not succeed because there was no competent stamp-authority finding of invalidity. The mortgaged and guaranteed documents were duly stamped and registered, and the corporate debtor&#039;s guarantees created enforceable obligations. Pending stamp proceedings and related company disputes did not displace the existing finding of debt and default or defeat the admitted insolvency action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 07:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 138 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752085</link>
      <description>A registered assignment deed and Section 5 of SARFAESI enable an assignee asset reconstruction company to step into the lender&#039;s shoes and maintain a Section 7 application as a financial creditor. The challenge that the assignment deed was insufficiently stamped did not succeed because there was no competent stamp-authority finding of invalidity. The mortgaged and guaranteed documents were duly stamped and registered, and the corporate debtor&#039;s guarantees created enforceable obligations. Pending stamp proceedings and related company disputes did not displace the existing finding of debt and default or defeat the admitted insolvency action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>