<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 129 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752076</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Chennai held that service tax liability on commission received by DTH installation service providers was revenue-neutral. The appellant provided installation and activation services for Sun DTH TV connections, receiving commission from the operator while customers paid activation charges inclusive of service tax to the operator directly. Following precedent from Kumar S Electronics case with identical facts, the Tribunal ruled that requiring service tax on commission would merely enable the DTH operator to claim Cenvat credit, making the exercise revenue-neutral. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 20:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 129 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752076</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Chennai held that service tax liability on commission received by DTH installation service providers was revenue-neutral. The appellant provided installation and activation services for Sun DTH TV connections, receiving commission from the operator while customers paid activation charges inclusive of service tax to the operator directly. Following precedent from Kumar S Electronics case with identical facts, the Tribunal ruled that requiring service tax on commission would merely enable the DTH operator to claim Cenvat credit, making the exercise revenue-neutral. The impugned order was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=752076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>