https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313797 A second anticipatory bail petition filed after withdrawal of an earlier petition, where counsel had undertaken that the petitioner would surrender within ten days, was held not maintainable when no justification was shown for non-compliance. The Court distinguished successive anticipatory bail petitions from successive regular bail petitions and treated the earlier withdrawal with undertaking as a material bar against re-agitation. On merits, anticipatory bail was also declined because the FIR alleged that the petitioner was the main accused, had threatened the complainant, and had used a forged affidavit to falsely implicate him, making custodial interrogation necessary. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 May 2024 21:17:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313797 A second anticipatory bail petition filed after withdrawal of an earlier petition, where counsel had undertaken that the petitioner would surrender within ten days, was held not maintainable when no justification was shown for non-compliance. The Court distinguished successive anticipatory bail petitions from successive regular bail petitions and treated the earlier withdrawal with undertaking as a material bar against re-agitation. On merits, anticipatory bail was also declined because the FIR alleged that the petitioner was the main accused, had threatened the complainant, and had used a forged affidavit to falsely implicate him, making custodial interrogation necessary. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313797